PR and the Gray Zone
Update: companion piece posted at Strumpette.
Time for another Moment of Venn:
- Transparent
- Advocate
- Professional
- Transparent + Professional = Reviewer
- Professional + Advocate = Astroturfer
- Advocate + Transparent = Customer Evangelist
Transparent + Professional + Advocate = Social Media PR Pro
Now - a little explanation about why the guys in gray are facing an uphill battle. The communities that “P.R. 2.0″ is so eager to “engage” and “influence” does not want them around.
It’s okay to go in as a reviewer with no financial ties to the outcome. It’s even better to be that amateur with a great love for a product or service. You can try to cultivate those, but you have to watch out that you don’t violate the rules of Word of Mouth marketing. It goes without saying that the Astroturf crowd is just a PR backlash waiting to happen. So why would anyone have a problem with someone who sits squarely in the center of the diagram? A clearly-identified professional advocate, there to share possibly valuable and fun information?
Now we’re getting to another anomaly regarding the Wisdom of Crowds.
Even though we can rationally understand that it is in our best interest for advocates to identify themselves, crowds respond in a different manner. The decisions we would make as individuals to encourage a certain class of behaviors go through a sociological wringer, and we end up with unintended consequences.
I’m no behavioral scientist, but the proof is out there. Look at the PR people who have been kicked out of Second Life, and those warned not to violate the sanctity of the almighty Wikipedia. Some little switch flips when a crowd is involved, and the priorities change. I fear it is more than an isolated phenomenon - maybe influencers within a group or meritocracy don’t want their hard-won position threatened by an outsider, particularly one with a suspect agenda. I’m not one to say - just one to observe.
The danger PR faces as a profession is that the thought leaders are pinning their hopes on getting into the gray on my graph. They can be as effective as advertisers and marketers, but with more return on investment. Classic little-brother syndrome. What the self-described thought-leaders haven’t addressed is the reality that the very communities they want to engage see their incursions as hostile. The Gray Zone is preferable to the radioactive glow of the Astroturf Zone, but each is presently uninhabitable for a sustainable campaign.
This explains why P.R. has been conducting a P.R. campaign for P.R., but how do you preach influence and the triumph of the individual when it’s not the individual who is the enemy - it is the crowd!
Again - I don’t know. I’m just articulating a problem that no one else has defined. Isolating individuals one-on-one, you can reason with them. Getting them into one-on-one dialogue is impossible when they traffic in flocks and communities. You’re already locked out before you ever get in, because the group-brain trumps the me-brain. It’s a delicious irony that the very people who have been liberated with technology, and are free to create and choose their own channels - those very individuals are unaware that they have become possessive of the groups they own. They don’t want P.R. around precisely because they treasure the time and energy they have invested in their community. The me-brain wants the attention. The group-brain wants you out of their parents’ basement.
This strikes an even bigger blow for P.R. as it tries to gain relevance in the corporate hierarchy. It was still fairly cost effective to reach groups when they all subscribed to limited channels. If you have five options, nothing is personal enough to warrant getting really worked up over it. That’s why ads were tolerated for so long on television. Now you can’t get away with that, because the consumer gets something closer to their wants, when they want it, preferably without interruption. And how dare you intrude!
Technorati Tags: Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, Wisdom of Crowds, Social Media, Public Relations, Astroturfing, Customer Evangelism
Geoff Livingston wrote,
Link | July 23rd, 2007 at 8:55 am
Ike wrote,
How do we measure that? How do we hold on to the Utopian ideal of “real one-to-one communication” when the individual doesn’t act like one?
Link | July 23rd, 2007 at 9:12 am
Geoff Livingston wrote,
When we reach out to other bloggers, we tell them what we do, provide the supposedly valuable info and shut up. They’re intelligent enough to figure out that we want them to write. If the info is valuable, then they will. And if it isn’t then we shouldn’t waste their time.
We don’t take on anymore ghost-writing blogs unless we can put the person on the client staff part time as a contract employee. The legacy blogs that we maintain we’ve made our clients put out disclaimers in the bio page saying they receive editorial support from Livingston Communications. To be frank, if I didn’t feel obliged, I would release these clients.
Increasingly our engagements are about monitoring and coaching. To engage on behalf of clients is like eating chicken without any spices.
Link | July 23rd, 2007 at 10:04 am
Accentuate the Positive, 2.0 » AtP2: New post on PR wrote,
[...] post on Public Relations over at Occam’s RazR. It’s the kind of thinking I used to do over here, but it’s over there. Go get [...]
Link | July 23rd, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Eric Eggertson wrote,
If PR folks don’t fit into a particular social media milieu, maybe they can equip others who can perform that role as a more natural part of their job.
Just because public relations person CAN do something, doesn’t mean they’re the right one for that particular function.
Link | July 23rd, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Ike wrote,
The larger issue is how does “PR” stand on all three pillars it holds so dear? Communities are rejecting PR reflexively with no opportunity to demonstrate good citizenship.
At some point, we may have to recognize that certain groups are genetically allergic to the idea of being spun or manipulated. If “PR” can’t quantify and define those specific indicators and attributes, then it is less science, more alchemy, and far less convincing about the value of its metrics.
Link | July 24th, 2007 at 2:11 am
The Buzz Bin » Blog Archive » Goodness Gracious, Great Blogs of Fire! wrote,
[...] to labels such as astroturfing and paid-for reviewer. Occam’s Razr blogger Ike Pigott discusses the very, very thin ice pros must traverse in social media [...]
Link | July 24th, 2007 at 4:54 am
media mindshare: on media, technology & public relations links for 2007-07-25 « wrote,
[...] PR and the Gray Zone: Ike Piggot at Occam’s RazR What do PR pros do when the communities they want to engage see their incursions as hostile? [...]
Link | July 24th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
sabu mangalasserril wrote,
Link | July 24th, 2007 at 10:48 pm
Kami Huyse wrote,
As for the Second Life rejection of PR, I want to correct your perception a bit. PRs were not rejected out of hand, only ones that made spurious claims (we were the first to XYZ) and didn’t apologize for those claims. For instance, as an avowed PR person, I was always welcome in SL. So, it was more of an individual problem. Same goes for Wikipedia, it was the actions of one person that caused the total backlash. I have found that many Wikipedians were happy to work with me on my concerns.
In the end, groupthink is always a concern, not just for PRs, but also in other contexts, firememes for example that spread discontent for a particular person or company. I hardly think that it is reserved just for PR.
Link | July 25th, 2007 at 9:23 am
Ike wrote,
Your idea about being “a resource instead of a mouthpiece” actually fits within my graph. Your wanting to be a resource connecting the client with its clientèle fits too. I think you’ll see the best cases of this at work within the Cyan Zone, where the customer evangelist niche resides.
I still hold to the original point, which is conversation works one-to-one - but we’re failing to account for the differences in behavior when that “one” is part of a group or a community. Individuals use a different form of reasoning from the safety and security of their mobs - and they are quick to distrust the outsider, particularly one who wants to sell them something.
Link | July 25th, 2007 at 9:59 am
Common Sense PR wrote,
Finding the Right Role for PR in Social Media…
There’s a reason why the top publications public relations people aren’t household names. Their job is to make things happen, not to make the news.
Does that apply on blogs and podcasts, too? Are we supposed to be facilitators, or movers an…
Link | August 1st, 2007 at 1:22 am
Michael Sommermeyer wrote,
Link | August 1st, 2007 at 8:21 am
Ike wrote,
Link | August 1st, 2007 at 8:41 am
The Importance of Relationships » The Buzz Bin wrote,
[...] of your relationships. The duty to my client. Nurturing those relationships are essential, as Eric Eggertson comments on Ike Pigott’s blog ‘good pr is more focused on relationship [...]
Link | August 3rd, 2007 at 8:32 am
Astroturfing on the Dark Side of the Moon » The Buzz Bin wrote,
[...] challenged by the overwhelming new wave of corporate social media initiatives. Ike Piggot wrote an excellent discussion of this fine line, and provided an interesting graph which demonstrates the blurred world of corporate social media. [...]
Link | August 6th, 2007 at 5:20 am
RazRchive » Occam’s Hors D’ Oeuvres wrote,
[...] digestible morsel - and then it become the icon for Occam’s RazR. I am particularly proud of PR and the Gray Zone which almost-but-didn’t-quite get noticed, and the Sweet Spot of Influence, which got no [...]
Link | October 30th, 2007 at 1:24 am