Comments on: Dr. Pepper cured my inbox

By: Attribution is the Sincerest Form of Flattery « Occam's RazR

Attribution is the Sincerest Form of Flattery « Occam's RazR — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:12:08 +0000

[...] If you will, stop and compare it to this: [...]

By: Taking Back Your Inbox - the E-mail Dilemma

Taking Back Your Inbox - the E-mail Dilemma — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:07:16 +0000

[...] Inbox Zero, 3X/Day Inbox, E-mail Bankruptcy [...]

By: Ike

Ike — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:38:34 +0000

Welcome back, Kami.

I hope 10-2-4 makes 9-5 easier.

By: Kami Huyse

Kami Huyse — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:26:45 +0000

Since I am starting back to work tomorrow this could not have come at a better time. I need some focal points to get back in the groove. I will follow your workplan tomorrow and see how it goes.

By: Marketing Profs

Marketing Profs — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:56:37 +0000

I’m winning the war on e-mail overload…

I’m following Ike Pigott’s Dr Pepper Plan – check email only at 10, 2 and 4. http://occamsrazr.com/2007/08/29/dr-pepper-cured-my-inbox/...

By: Jeremy Pepper

Jeremy Pepper — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:26:08 +0000

Really, it was no problem. Glad I could help out.

http://flickr.com/photos/jspepper/18211154/

By: Dr. Pepper cured my inbox - beforeyoukillyourcomputer.com - Saving computers one at a time from their owners

Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:25:54 +0000

[...] Source Supported Social Bookmarking Sites: [...]

By: The Caveman

The Caveman — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:58:41 +0000

Roto rooter did my in box. I like it that way.

By: Jason Falls

Jason Falls — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:15:04 +0000

Great suggestion and certainly one we’d all probably have a hard time implementing.

Have you read or heard Tim Ferris’s four hour work week spiel? There’s an episode of The Daily Idea (www.dailyidea.tv) coming up this week about it. He goes a step further and checks late morning and late afternoon, I think. I also like his suggestion of flipping the 80-20 principle. We normally spend 80 percent of our time on clients that supply 20 percent of our income. We should go at it the other way around.

All great thoughts!