communication. community. cognition.
Simply Stupid
I’m all about trying to keep things simple – that’s even the tag line for this site.
So I have to wonder when I see a popular link circulating on the internet:
Simple Living Manifesto: 72 Ideas to Simplify Your Life
- Did they really get that list down to the core?
- Are there really 72 steps for simplicity?
- Should I take advice from anyone who can’t think any more critically than this?
Some of these are funny by themselves:
- Create a simplicity statement
- Eat slowly
- Streamline your life
- Find inner simplicity (does this involve untangling my intestines?)
Some are funny in tandem:
- Do what you love
- Spend time with people you love (not to be confused with the above)
- Spend time alone
- Create a simple system for housework
- Make your house minimalist (which cuts down on the need for housework)
- Limit your communications
- Keep your e-mail inbox empty (which works nicely with the previous one how?)
- Consider a smaller car
- Try living without a car
- Reduce your consumption of advertising
- Read Walden, by Thoreau (AH! Advertising!)
- Read Simplify Your Life, by Elaine St. James (AH! Advertising again!)
- Simplify your online life (Now, this is good. Use RSS feeds to me more efficient…)
- Simplify your RSS feeds (ACK! Damn!)
- Carry less stuff
- Learn to pack light (Which is different, how, exactly?)
- Establish routines
- Use a minimalist productivity system (Which is different than a routine, how, exactly?)
- Create morning and evening routines (Wha?)
- Create a morning writing ritual (Wha Wha?)
You know, I could buy this if the writer actually sat down and tried to put some actual structure into this. Many of these points could easily fit as sub-points in bigger buckets. Unfortunately, this is the sort of blog post title that attracts links and interest. Insert your own favorite simile. Ultimately, If I want 72 steps, I’ll watch 1.846 Hitchcock movies or join six addiction support groups.[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, productivity, simplicity[/tags]
| Print article | This entry was posted by Ike on September 6, 2007 at 6:53 am, and is filed under Communication, Philosophy. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
The Crowdsourced Looking Glass
about 1 year ago - 16 comments
We don’t really need a Reason to Be, but it certainly helps to occasionally step back and look at a larger picture. What is Occam’s RazR? What do I want it to be? It’s not what we saw from the first incarnation of the “personal weblog.” I don’t share everything here. I have Facebook, and
Less is More on Facebook
about 2 years ago - 3 comments
More than a few people have commented about the new Facebook Lite interface. I will simply add the impressions from a co-worker of mine who is blind. I suggested it to her this morning as we were discussing social networking, and how difficult some of the navigation can be. I had a hunch that the Lite
The Dream Job
about 3 years ago - 11 comments
When I was interviewing for my current job, I was asked why I wanted it. True, everyone loves getting a paycheck (and some even love being employed.) But my answer came back to the intersection of things I enjoyed. I actually traced the following diagram on my desk for the interview committee: These are three
Too Simple
about 3 years ago - 5 comments
If there is a unifying there here, it’s in explaining the seemingly complex in the most simple way possible. Occam’s Razor is a means of comparing multiple explanations or theories, with the notion that the simplest is likely the truth. However, many people are guiding themselves by the fallacy that the simplest explanation is the
Ugly and Rough
about 3 years ago - 3 comments
“Ugly” and “rough” – at least in the English language – sound sort of like they are. They certainly don’t roll off the tongue like “pretty” and “smooth.” There’s a whole chicken-and-egg argument that we could make about whether ugly-sounding words describe ugly things, or if we associate the ugliness of a word to that
Making Pearls
about 3 years ago - No comments
In the last couple of years with the Red Cross, I have been involved in some of the strangest crisis communications challenges you can imagine. Notice, I didn’t say “most intense” or “most difficult” or even “most noteworthy.” In most of these cases, we’re talking about a local chapter and its relationship to its community.
Occam’s Hors D’ Oeuvres
about 4 years ago - 11 comments
Meme alert! Meme alert! Meme alert! Push and shove your way to the nearest exits! I’ve been tagged. Some really smart guy named Jeremiah Owyang has classified a bunch of internet users as “media snackers.” not in it for the “long haul” you want quick, easily digestible bits you want to consume it where you
Occam on TV!
about 4 years ago - 5 comments
Two network shows invoke Occam’s Razor on consecutive nights – less than two weeks after one of the shows was featured on Occam’s RazR. Coincidence?
about 4 years ago
That is a wonderfully hiliarious post! I love it when people add common sense to conversations, etc. It’s similar to British humor.
about 4 years ago
Gosh, why not 50? 75? 5? 101?
Ah, but then here in the U.S. we have a magazine, Real Simple, which among other things gives us tips about how to declutter our lives…and part of that clutter are those stacks of Real Simple.
We humans do love the lists, don’t we? But, really, if you need these types of tips, you shouldn’t be allowed to feed yourself, much less out of the house.
about 4 years ago
I can’t count that high. Why would you do this to me?