<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Divides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/</link>
	<description>communication. community. cognition.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 05:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Lauper</title>
		<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Lauper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occamsrazr.com/?p=691#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>The Achille&#039;s heel for Craig&#039;s List, which newspaper corporations have been oddly lax in exploiting, is that there are FHA regulations against discriminating against renters on the basis of religion, race, etc. and newspapers spend a lot of money on staff to check these illegally-worded ads.

All it would take someone to press suit against Craig&#039;s list, and they would be forced to spend millions on staff to parse their ads, or drop real estate listings entirely.

The explanation that I see for the newspapers failing to do this is that their management these days is largely incompetent and ignorant of their own industry and the laws that apply to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Achille&#8217;s heel for Craig&#8217;s List, which newspaper corporations have been oddly lax in exploiting, is that there are FHA regulations against discriminating against renters on the basis of religion, race, etc. and newspapers spend a lot of money on staff to check these illegally-worded ads.</p>
<p>All it would take someone to press suit against Craig&#8217;s list, and they would be forced to spend millions on staff to parse their ads, or drop real estate listings entirely.</p>
<p>The explanation that I see for the newspapers failing to do this is that their management these days is largely incompetent and ignorant of their own industry and the laws that apply to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Daniel Mezei</title>
		<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Daniel Mezei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occamsrazr.com/?p=691#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>Ike,

&quot;...soon to be dumped in the Great Browser Bookmark Bin.&quot;

Infatuated with that line, postscript!

Speaking as I am from a nation of just 10 million in size and an obscure language likely only 15 million people comprehend planet-wide, I&#039;d have to say the Digital Revolution in the Czech Republic can and will be capitalized upon in ways most Americans can&#039;t fathom, given the relative sizes of the respective populations.

Abolishing things like paper newspapers and other printed materials makes sense for a small nimble society with governments focusing hard on the youth agenda.

Some Americans, for instance, lament the untimely passing of paper, and this despair is legitimate for a society thirty times the size of the Czech Republic&#039;s. The sheer number of people *still* making primary use of the newspaper as their source of info is understandable in the US context.

Small nations don&#039;t have this luxury, given that they&#039;re not as well-endowed.

Bring on (yet another) revolution in this country, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike,</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;soon to be dumped in the Great Browser Bookmark Bin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Infatuated with that line, postscript!</p>
<p>Speaking as I am from a nation of just 10 million in size and an obscure language likely only 15 million people comprehend planet-wide, I&#8217;d have to say the Digital Revolution in the Czech Republic can and will be capitalized upon in ways most Americans can&#8217;t fathom, given the relative sizes of the respective populations.</p>
<p>Abolishing things like paper newspapers and other printed materials makes sense for a small nimble society with governments focusing hard on the youth agenda.</p>
<p>Some Americans, for instance, lament the untimely passing of paper, and this despair is legitimate for a society thirty times the size of the Czech Republic&#8217;s. The sheer number of people *still* making primary use of the newspaper as their source of info is understandable in the US context.</p>
<p>Small nations don&#8217;t have this luxury, given that they&#8217;re not as well-endowed.</p>
<p>Bring on (yet another) revolution in this country, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RazRchive &#187; Digital Multiplies</title>
		<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>RazRchive &#187; Digital Multiplies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occamsrazr.com/?p=691#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>[...] having written about the Digital Divides, I feel it&#8217;s only fair to share the live with those innocent little scraper programs that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] having written about the Digital Divides, I feel it&#8217;s only fair to share the live with those innocent little scraper programs that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/comment-page-1/#comment-1823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occamsrazr.com/?p=691#comment-1823</guid>
		<description>Actually Mike, we&#039;re both right.

The Digital Revolution is going to swallow mass media.  The hemorrhaging of jobs is not a sign of downfall, but rather of a failure to shift to a new business model.

What started as very different &quot;tv&quot; and &quot;print&quot; properties will be competing with each other in pixels.  Channel 2 News will be more of a branding statement than anything else, because the channel number doesn&#039;t mean anything online.  (And next February when the digital signals come, all of your local teevee channel numbers become void.)

The financial barrier to become a media player continues to drop.  Those who enjoyed near-monopolies (or FCC-mandated scarcity) within their media silos are just now discovering they are soon to be dumped in the Great Browser Bookmark Bin with everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Mike, we&#8217;re both right.</p>
<p>The Digital Revolution is going to swallow mass media.  The hemorrhaging of jobs is not a sign of downfall, but rather of a failure to shift to a new business model.</p>
<p>What started as very different &#8220;tv&#8221; and &#8220;print&#8221; properties will be competing with each other in pixels.  Channel 2 News will be more of a branding statement than anything else, because the channel number doesn&#8217;t mean anything online.  (And next February when the digital signals come, all of your local teevee channel numbers become void.)</p>
<p>The financial barrier to become a media player continues to drop.  Those who enjoyed near-monopolies (or FCC-mandated scarcity) within their media silos are just now discovering they are soon to be dumped in the Great Browser Bookmark Bin with everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Driehorst</title>
		<link>http://occamsrazr.com/2008/08/12/digital-divides/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Driehorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occamsrazr.com/?p=691#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Ike: Great points, though I&#039;m not so sure if &quot;[t]he Digital Revolution will eventually claim us all.&quot; 

What the digital revolution has done is open up more opportunities. There will always be newspapers. Always (at least during the next lifetime or two). There will always be a need for broadcast TV and radio. Mass advertising will be able to fill some need, depending on the campaign.

The old methods and processes won&#039;t completely die. They may be in altered states, but they&#039;ll still be viable options for the right situations.
-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike: Great points, though I&#8217;m not so sure if &#8220;[t]he Digital Revolution will eventually claim us all.&#8221; </p>
<p>What the digital revolution has done is open up more opportunities. There will always be newspapers. Always (at least during the next lifetime or two). There will always be a need for broadcast TV and radio. Mass advertising will be able to fill some need, depending on the campaign.</p>
<p>The old methods and processes won&#8217;t completely die. They may be in altered states, but they&#8217;ll still be viable options for the right situations.<br />
-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

