Let’s talk about identity for a little bit.
Do you know me? And if the answer is yes, let’s ask how you know me.
- Do you know where I live?
- Have we shared a meal?
- Have we talked on the phone?
- Have we swapped e-mails?
- Have you followed me on Twitter enough to know when I am joking?
- Did we go to school together?
- Are you family?
- Did I play a part in your wedding?
- Do you know my passwords?
There are many degrees of knowledge, but when you get right down to it there are big cracks in the picture. Psychologically, we want to gloss over them because it’s uncomfortable to be with a stranger.
- So we swapped an e-mail. Anyone can spoof an address that looks legit.
- So we talked on the phone. Whose voice was that again?
- Twitter? Good luck.
- We went to school together? Think again.
Goldman’s Sacked
Enter John Goldman. John is about as off-the-grid as you can get. There are faint traces of him in my first high school yearbook: a picture here or there, and never any decent shot of his face. Some faculty members at Tuscaloosa County High School were quite worried when he didn’t show up for the 1984 graduation rehearsal. He never picked up his cap, gown, or any of his supplies.
John Goldman didn’t walk with his classmates. He couldn’t, because he was a creature of a total fabrication. Members of the yearbook staff made him out of whole cloth. (Full disclosure: I was not on the staff, but know the mastermind and those intimately involved.) It was a germ of a joke that sprouted legs, joined civic clubs, and failed to pick up its graduation paraphernalia. It was a deception and a conspiracy guided by an unusually light touch, and lasted longer than by rights it should if not for the discipline of those involved to keep the joke on the down-low.
It was identity theft, without an identity.
Circles and Rings
Which brings me to today.
I have several circles of friends in my Facebook. There is my high school crowd from Alabama. There’s my junior high crowd from Idaho (which has graciously granted me dual citizenship, if my alma mater once again forgets to invite me to a reunion.) There is a clique of former coworkers in Red Cross, my brothers and sisters in Kung Fu, and various communicators and marketers I’ve been privileged to connect with on various projects or to brainstorm. And there’s family.
These groups, these subtribes, are not created equal. Some know me as Ike, some know me as Isaac. Some have seen me cry, some have seen me bleed. Some have been over to my house for holidays, and some have been able to jump into a conversation with me as though 25 years had not flown by.
Some don’t know which foods I hate, nor which teams I root for, nor which movies I will never watch no matter the offered bounty. Some have no clue I grew up in Idaho, and many of them might have nominated me as least-likely to ever teach a martial art. It’s a good thing we’ve got profiles online to help us fill in the cracks, right?
Faceless Book
Unfortunately, we’ve now got these online profiles that help other people fill in the cracks.
Case in point: I have two friends on Facebook that I have worked with in the past. I worked with them in very different capacities on stories and projects years ago. As it happens, they are both affiliated with the same Bible college. Which means now my “People You May Know” box is filled with people that they know, and there is an assumption that I do as well. In my case, this is merely an annoyance.
Second case: Half of the graduating class in Idaho went to a different junior high, so I really never knew them at all. Seeing people with 31 mutual friends might be a strong indication that this indeed is one of my classmates, and with so many women using married names it can be really difficult to keep up. I find myself asking some rather rude questions, just to ensure I’m not adding a complete stranger and granting access to my private information. (Not that there’s anything salacious or dangerous there, but you see where this is headed…)
Which got me to thinking: What if John Goldman started friending people from the Tuscaloosa County High class of 1984? How many would add him? After all, he is in the yearbook, right?
And how many would add him after three mutual friends showed up? What if it were five? 12? 21?
The vast majority of online theft is not hardcore math or data-hacking. It’s human hacking. It’s gaining human trust, and abusing that trust to trick us into handing over the keys. The numbers game of social networking has made it even easier to exploit, because now you don’t need to scam but a couple of people to see the rest start to tumble like dominos. The inherent peer pressure, combined with the desire to not admit that you might have rudely “forgotten” someone can be a powerful motivation toward a single click of the mouse.
As the threshold of “friendship” continues to degrade, mostly through the abuse and dilution of the term by social networks, we need to be smarter about how we connect. We now compile vast banks of data with little regard to who might see it. We pretend like we’re surrounded by a wall of “friends,” but increasingly there are cracks in that perimeter, the banks are breached.
And even if Willie Sutton didn’t really say it, the banks will be targets because that’s where the money is.


Enjoyed the post, Ike, as it reflects a lot of concerns I have about where the online community will end up, but also some of the hope I hold for it. While YOUR intentions are genuine, who knows about the next guy — who may or may not be John Goldman?
One of my online connections (Plug: Now being interviewed on my blog) simply insists that these cyber relationships don’t scale. He calls our online connections a community of “friendz,” most of whom we really don’t know.
We need to rethink online community building or I fear the system may implode. Those “cracks in the perimeter” are already leaking badly.
Bill, thanks for crystallizing the thrust of the conclusion.
While your interview subject banged the drum quite loudly, it was always the wrong drum. His concerns were always scaled to the corporate level, but the backlash, mistrust, and the change in online habits will come as the “cracks in the perimeter” lead to toxic spills in the personal and individual arena.
The drum that should have played that rhythm was a snare, or even a tambourine, not the big bass tub.
Thanks for sticking with me.
First off, yes to all but two of those questions.
Part of the issue is in how you use social media and how your contacts use it. in Linkedin, there are the LION (Linked-In Open Network) folks that open their connections to anyone, anywhere. The feel there is a benefit in having a “network” of tens of thousands of contacts.
Me, not so much. I prefer to use the social networking sites to remember “that guy” I worked with three jobs ago or a friend I no longer get to see on person very much.
Of course, the social media sites want you to “grow” your networks so they constantly recommend potential connections based on network proximity and common interests. I don’t meet new people on social networks, nor do I want to. I prefer to meet real people and use technology to keep from losing contact with them.
Ike, I enjoyed this post because it is something I worry about regularly. I do enjoy Facebook, but try to limit items to “friends only”. There are people from my past who connect, but I don’t really care, but I figure they are harmless. At the end of the day, my real friends are the ones that I regularly correspond with on FB and Twitter, etc. If I need to cry, for example, I go to e-mail and the phone.
Geoff — one of the themes that has emerged in these discussions is that networks that might have overlapping populations don’t have overlapping purposes. You are smart to have a plan for how each will be useful to you, and pay little heed to how others think you should be using it.
You sure you didn’t pass Goldman in the halls during his Junior year? Didn’t you try to sell him an elevator key?
A few months ago I was called an ‘elitist snob’ because I didn’t friend every Tom, Dick and Harry that I might have a possible connection to on Facebook.
If I don’t talk to you in a consistent basis in real life, we don’t need to be ‘friends’ online.
Apparently I’m in the vast minority on feeling this way.
Ike,
I thought you and your readers might enjoy hearing what Richard Watson has to say about all this:
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,3907973,00.html