{{myquote|The Internet has replaced the mirror as the number one tool for enabling Narcissism. (and if you share this quote, I demand you give me credit.)}}
Archives for October 2009
Mirror Mirror
Justice in the Digital Age

I was a cardboard-haired teevee news weasel in a previous life. I’ve never regretted leaving, and have no desire to be in a maelstrom today.
Two quick thoughts.
One is about the massive hoax perpetrated on the media yesterday. A group of activists spoofed the identity of the US Chamber of Commerce, and got several news outlets to bite on a phony news conference. Those outlets all reported the Chamber’s sudden (and non-existent) reversal of policy regarding climate change.
But hey – by all means let’s do a whole Fact Check segment on a Saturday Night Live sketch.
The second has to do with the legal system.
I remember covering the SEC asset forfeiture hearings for HealthSouth founder Richard Scrushy. They were the beginning of his legal troubles, which culminated in fraud convictions and billion-dollar civil suits. (I wrote about Scrushy and HealthSouth quite a bit on my old blog, which remains as an archive.)
At the time, that federal judge was a stickler for technology. She was quite dismayed to find that reporters from Bloomberg, with new-fangled BlackBerry wireless devices, were able to send dispatches from the room. (Of course, in order to get a signal, they had to sit on the back row and sometimes place the device against the wall…)
Contrast that with today, where the federal judge presiding over the corruption trial of Birmingham Mayor Larry Langford issued a directive to the jurors:
It’s not just that the judge was specifically acknowledging Tweets – it was the resignation that we have a technology that can’t readily be stopped.
I’m certain there have been numerous judicial conferences and seminars addressing the changing communications landscape. It would be no more fruitful to ban Twitter than it would to tell jurors they can’t go near a newsstand. He simply warned them about mixing outside information with what goes on within the boundaries of evidence.
For what it is worth, the “tweets from others” doesn’t just refer to friends and family. In this case, there are no fewer than six media outlets Tweeting from within the courtroom. I created a page where you can follow the Langford Trial real-time if you want, including the occasional video from Birmingham Weekly‘s Kyle Whitmire.
Update:
From John Archibald:
Judge is on his blackberry. I wonder if he’s following the trial on twitter. There are a lot of twits around here. #langford
Acting Isn’t Reality
{{myquote|The ability to recite Dennis Hopper’s “run the ole Picket Fence at ‘em” speech from Hoosiers doesn’t make you a basketball coach. Neither does it make you Dennis Hopper.}}
More Thinking Social
Yesterday, I shared some ideas about how cable and satellite companies could not only enhance user experience through their DVRs, but could generate significant revenue and affiliate streams by incorporating more Thinking Social into their software.
I promised another idea today.
Sonic Boom
The second idea is more specific, and revolves around the current campaign for Sonic. The premise for the ads is simple, based on meaningless front-seat conversations in the drive-through.
(Aren’t you glad I had auto-start turned off?)
The commercials work because they walk that fine line between the real and the surreal. It’s a situation we’ve all been in, and I’m pretty sure that my conversations with my wife and my brother have been no less alternate-universe.
So, here’s the opportunity for Sonic to step up with being Social.
Invite people to send in their own 20-second clips. Do it as an online audition. Let people vote. Then put as many of the ads to work as you can:
- The winning ad gets added to the television rotation nationwide
- Regional winners would be run on the air within their own hometowns
- Local spots that meet the standard would be run on the web.
Obviously, you’d vet the spots to make sure there was no hidden nudity, and no one throwing in gestures for “shock value.”
How exactly would those local spots work again?
Run them online. Run them on Facebook, targeted to specific cities. Run them inside your friend’s list on Facebook. It’s not as intrusive as those ads that associate your picture with a product without explicit permission – this is a clear case of consent. (No one goes to the trouble of putting together a :20 video, with all the editing involved, on a particular topic, and submitting it through a portal and then gets shocked when it is used.)
Put the rest on a branded YouTube channel, and let people watch themselves over and over, all the while reinforcing your delicious tater tots.
The opportunities are there. You don’t even have to be good at Food Math.
Thinking Social

Do you hear that thunder in the distance?
That’s the sound of ordinary people unshackling themselves from traditional one-way media. And it’s going to get louder.
If you’re a business that relies on traditional advertising models, now would be a good time to figure out where those people are going with their newfound freedom, and maybe even make a buck or two as you make them happy.
What follows are a couple of ideas I offer to the business world, free of charge, after spending a few minutes thinking Social.
TiVo Judo
One of the great lessons a non-martial artist can learn from martial arts is the concept of using opposing energy in your favor. Judo – the codified sport version of Jujitsu – is all about taking your opponent’s momentum and force and redirecting it. Aikido (a beautiful art made famous as the “bits between Steven Seagal’s awful acting) accomplishes this in simple, circular movements. So how can traditional media benefit from the momentum behind TiVo and DVR?
One of the features I wish I had on my DVR is a bookmark. That way when there are touchdowns or key plays in the game I am watching, I can press a button and have a placeholder. Then I can go back and enjoy them faster.
Share the moments
Of course, Thinking Social means understanding how cool it would be to share those bookmarks with other viewers. The first DVR provider (Comcast, Charter, TiVo, DirecTV) to figure this out will have a huge leg up. We’re not talking about an expensive hardware update to make that happen, either.
But I am thinking even bigger. If the disruption of the DVR is a threat to traditional advertising, then why not redirect it? Yes, it would be problematic to share time-codes from DirecTV with Charter, and TiVo with Brighthouse. So let’s find a common platform: YouTube.
Instead of simply bookmarking the index on my DVR hard drive, give me the option to have that :30 clip of the winning touchdown uploaded to YouTube.
Regaining control
(But wait, Ike… that’s insane! In a popular sporting event, you’d have more than a million people uploading the same clip!)
Well, guess what? They’re doing it anyway. But if DirecTV is smart about it, when you click to bookmark and YouTube the clip they’ll handle it another way:
- The clip will be uploaded only once
- Instead of being tied to each individual user, it will instead be “Favorited” by your account
- The Favoriting will trigger any additional pinging, such as notifications sent to Twitter and Facebook and the new flavor of the day
- The clip will have a :10 or :15 ad built into the front of it.
DirecTV will only have to upload it once, and will have instant feedback about what is popular. It can also sell the interstitial ad (which is permanently “stitched” into the clip) and share revenues with the original broadcast provider. So, if it’s the SEC game of the week on CBS, CBS get’s 70% of the cut from those ad views. Or maybe CBS chooses to run a promo for its own programming in that slot.
Then, DirecTV (substitute your DVR provider as needed) gets to place ads around the video, and can even offer discounts and premiums to those who refer the most views. If you happen to come to my YouTube page and watch the video, there will be an icon you can click on to find out more about DirecTV’s super-awesome Social-DVR service (and if you buy through my referral I get a free month of programming, or something.)
Win-Win-Win-Win
There is a huge opportunity here, because they would be making it easy for me to share with the people who probably have compatible likes and dislikes. Content creators aren’t left in the lurch, because someone is paying the bills. YouTube will like it because it can make money on a single upload viewed 10,000 times moreso than 100 uploads watched 100 times. Advertisers will like it because it provides a real-time metric of what people will share, a buzz-worthy meter.
And I will like it because the (funniest happiest scariest) moments in (sports news entertainment) get shared as quickly and easily as possible.
So, DVR makers. Get to cracking.
Idea #2 comes tomorrow.
Building a Dynasty
“Do as I say, not as I do.”
Culturally-speaking, that’s often seen as a statement of weakness – uttered by one who lacks the willpower to stick by their own rules. However, we tend to take that concept further than we should. And it has to do with our forgetting the difference between practitioners, teachers and coaches.
Practitioners get things done. They perform the actual tasks. They play the game from whistle to whistle, they run the track. And while practitioners can eventually become teachers or coaches, there’s no guarantee they have the skills to succeed.
Teachers exhibit a level of mastery, and their job is to bring their students to the bar. Whatever that bar of expectation is, the teacher must bring the student along. To do so, the teacher must demonstrate the same level of ability in performing the task. A math teacher can’t teach you the quadratic equation without showing you how it’s done on the board.
Coaches are a little different, because no one expects the coach to run every lap faster than the student. It’s the coach’s job to help practitioners figure out how they can improve, and set them on a path for that. Often, that requires a level of mastery in the theory of an activity, even if there is no longer the physical ability to carry it out.
Why do I highlight these distinctions? Because the failure to understand them is resulting in a lot of ill will in the communication arts.
When everyone is an expert.
I’m flabbergasted at the number of people who sell themselves as “Social Media Experts” or “Gurus” or whatever the title du jour is.
Being free to start and easy to learn, one of the selling points of these revolutionary tools is that “anyone can do it.” But how many can do it well?
- The ability to dribble a basketball doesn’t make you Michael Jordan.
- The ability to recite Dennis Hopper’s “run the ole Picket Fence at ’em” speech from Hoosiers doesn’t make you a basketball coach.
- Neither does it make you Dennis Hopper.
- The ability to be a goalie in soccer won’t help you be a goalie in hockey, much less a forward.
We’ve got a lot of people who have proven they can do one thing, and they are hanging up a shingle to sell you on something else.
Choosing the right path.
Now, if you’re a business looking to get involved in a new endeavor, you have some options:
- Hire a big name and let them carry you to the top.
- Hire someone cheap, and hope for the best.
- Hire no one, and let best practices bubble up from your own people.
- Hire a coach who can bring the best out of your people.
Notice that I am not talking about Social Media here. This goes for anything, but let’s see how it applies.
Go hire that big name (like a Robert Scoble) and that person will bring you an instant audience and instant credibility. But when that person leaves, who owns the knowledge? Who owns the relationships? Who owns the accounts? Who is ready to step up and fill the shoes?
Go hire that affordable alternative. Why not? In the grand scheme of things, you can write it all off as a pilot project.
Don’t hire anyone. (Be prepared for very mixed results, and a very nervous legal team.)
Go get a coach, who has a proven ability to elevate your game. Build bench strength. Build for the future, by injecting the change comfortably into the culture. Granted, there are very few of these coaches around. Within Social Media, there are many people who are great at what they do, but it might have little to do with coaching ability and everything to do with their own knowledge of the industry they are augmenting.
Past performance is no proof of future success.
Here’s the dirty secret: there are several reasons why social media practitioners do well. Some are just born with the right attitude for personal and conversational communication. If they have that knack, you can take someone with a few years experience in your company and they might shine. But take them out of your company, and they will be hopelessly lost (like the guy who won every golf tournament, until he got on a real course and couldn’t find the Clown’s Mouth.)
That is the Practitioner – very skilled, but not necessarily versatile enough to change games.
Some have the ability to show you what they do and how they do it, and you are able to follow the steps and emulate their success. This can be a good thing, but it also deceives. The guy who shows you how to get 80,000 Twitter followers might not have a clue what to do with them. His strength is solely in acquisition, not in leveraging or in calls-to-action.
That is the Teacher – who can instruct you on how to do what they’ve already done.
How to spot those who can really help you:
- They have proven their skills in different kinds of businesses and business models.
- They don’t have immediate answers, but instead follow with more detailed and insightful questions.
- They create ideas, concepts and systems that no one has ever seen – because your challenge is unique.
That’s how you know you’ve found a Coach. The person who will push you to heights you couldn’t have reached alone, and will leave you better than she found you. The person who will draw indirectly from past experiences and directly from sound principles to craft solutions to your problems. The individual who can fade into the background after launch, confident those he trained are self-sustaining and know how to improve on their own.
You know when you’ve found a coach, when you hear his students calling their own shots.
Shaking things up
It was time for a new look.
I liked the old look, but there was something about the old “old look” that was missing.
Yet, the “old” old look lacked several features.
This look will get some tweaking in the meantime.


