Five Years Talking

Obviously, I have been talking for much longer than that.

However, today marks five years being a spokesman for Alabama Power.

That’s an odd sort of thing to remember, as it did not involve a massive employment change, or promotion. If you’d like, you could consider it a “battlefield promotion” of sorts.

I was dubbed a company spokesperson at 11:32 a.m. – squarely between two enormous storm systems that struck Alabama on April 27, 2011.

I remember self-deploying to the office at 5 a.m., when I realized we had seven counties with tornado warnings, and 35,000 customers without service. I even stopped in a parking lot on the way, to avoid a coming gust front of more than 90 miles-an-hour.

The deadly wave hit around 3 that afternoon, and continued for hours. With my “promotion” in hand, I suddenly had more leeway with what I could tweet from the @AlabamaPower account, how I could engage, and how to use it to get intelligence. We assured whole neighborhoods, we got pictures directly from the heart of the carnage – and we also shared images of coming recovery and hope.

Who knows what I will be doing five years from now? Probably looking back at ten years after. Because it was that kind of day.

It is rather odd how the days that define us the most can remain so clear, vivid and detailed in our memory.


almost midnightI will be doing more talking in the coming weeks.

And after more than eight sporadic years, I will be doing less talking here.

At some point, this site and archive will be coming down. It’s time to mothball these essays, and figure out what they are and what they mean and what value they might still hold.

Of all the acclaim, I was proudest of something my mother said: “I like how what you write there seems timeless.”

Maybe what passes for my wit and wisdom will retain some of that value, and I can salvage it into something else. A different project, different product, different format.

I have several presentations to wrap up this week, and some conference work. So I don’t know how much longer this Razr will stay sharp.

But it has been one hell of a ride, hasn’t it?

Share Button

Stop failing our kids

Apparently, the number one thing you can do in school is Fail. Not “fail,” as in the lowercase meaning of “missing a standard.” No, I mean “Fail,” as in “make a particular grade that comes with a negative connotation.”

I was talking with my friend K., whose child is close in age to mine but goes to a different local school system. We talked about the ridiculous nature of the modern science fair — and about my belief that they have become ridiculous pageants to appease the parental ego. The percentage of school science projects actually done by the children is beginning to fall even below the percentage of Pinewood Derby race cars that aren’t built by Dad. (If soccer started allowing the parents to do all of the work, the games would be more entertaining, if only for the fistfights.)

Type casting

Anyway, K. and her little R. (age 9) have been struggling all week with an assignment to develop a new book cover for a short story. Instead of just asking for a brief book report, a synopsis, the teacher is asking for a selling point. Show us the blurb that would sell others on wanting to read it.

I actually like that twist on the assignment. You have to read the book, and then figure out how to pitch it. Anyway, the kids were given a template page, and told to ‘neatly print’ their synopsis on the cover.

Yesterday, one of the moms turned in the assignment, and the teacher showed it off as an example of what to do.

It was in PowerPoint.

Now K. is freaking out, because R. has been working on improving his penmanship, and practicing writing his words very carefully. Because, as it turns out, the “printing neatly” part is worth 20 percent of the grade.

Failing to measure

This is where I have a problem with the assignment. As you might know, I am a huge fan of incentives/disincentives. If you reward the proper things, you will get the proper things in the future. If you punish good things, you get less of them.

clippy

Clippy is hear too help!

In this instance, you would hope the grade would be based upon what R. learns this year. Just three weeks into school, I don’t believe any teacher has the expectation that his handwriting will have improved. So if R. just has ordinary penmanship for a nine-year-old, he will be penalized. Yet, if R. (and his mother) type and print the entire thing, then by all means award the full 20 points for that part of the assignment! Never mind that when it’s typed, you lose all grasp of who actually did the work. Did R. type it? Did K.? Did R. catch the spelling errors, or did Clippy?

This sends a number of clear messages to students:

  • It doesn’t matter what you learn.
  • It doesn’t matter whether you improve.
  • We are going to base today’s grade on things you did or didn’t learn in previous grades.
  • It doesn’t matter whether you do your own work.

Lord knows we have enough issues with helicopter parents. Teachers, I am looking at you for this one. Stop rewarding the obvious meddling in a child’s education. If a kid is obviously turning in Mommy’s work (or Dad’s,) then call them out on it. Stop celebrating the “genius” of a child who isn’t learning anything!

Encourage the kids who try. Not with bogus participation ribbons, but how about reserving the A grades for kids who do their own work? Stop failing our kids. Not with the assignment of a silly letter – but by giving up on making them do the work themselves.

If you like this rant, share it. And tell me you liked it, so I might be encouraged to write more of them. Because I believe that incentives matter.

Share Button

Opining on The Origin of Outrage Culture

My friend Carl Carter posed an interesting notion on Facebook, that I share here:

I’m not a big scripture quoter, but reflecting on our instant collective condemnations of distant people and things we’d never hear of but for Facebook, “Matthew 7:3 comes to mind: Why do you see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?”

What’ll today’s viral outrage be? A tacky note left on a car? (I suspect half those are faked clickbait anyway.) Yet another police shooting video?

Whatever it takes to escape our own little reality…

That prompted my thought:

escher-crystal-ballWe have always been connected to a smaller sphere of immediate proximity. Now we are connected to the world at large, and we seek some sort of commonality to make the proximity less awkward.

So we share outrageous outrages, that are of little importance to any of our lives, but serve to give us a sense of belonging and communal head-nodding and finger-wagging.

It makes the Big Empty less scary.

Related:

There are many other forces at work in determining what we share and why. Have you identified your own triggers? Share in the comments.

Share Button

Professionalism

I have a friend who starts a new job next week. (Congratulations to her, it is a sweet gig. I am jealous.)

quality3This isn’t about her new job, though. It is about her current one.

She is writing a piece for her present employer, and called me up to pick my brain. You see, she wants it to be great, and she is reaching out to people who can give her additional insight and perspective. Several people. It was only in this conversation that I found out something better was coming her way.

There, did you catch it?

  • This is not a person who phones it in.
  • This is not a person who half-asses it.
  • This is not a person who walks away without being proud of her work.

She didn’t realize (but may now) that if I am ever called upon as a reference I have a great story to tell. That she was going extra miles on what would seem to be a rather pedestrian assignment, at a time when others would have been following their feet out the door. Honestly, the piece she is working on is could be little more than padding out the word count. But not for her.

And that is the essence of professionalism.

Share Button

Things that last

I don’t always like the way we use the word “invest,” or “investment.” Too often, it is associated with the concept of risk. Conversely, it gets lumped in with reward. Rarely do we look at investing as something that is worth doing with no regard to outcome.

Years ago — many, actually — I spent five dollars on a pencil. It was bundled in with the rest of my books and supplies as I got ready for my first semester of college. (With tax, it was $5.39, which in today’s dollars is an even $11.50.)

As you can imagine, I was met with ridicule from some friends and family members, who wondered if such a purchase was evidence that my scholarships should be revoked. “You’ll lose that thing in a week,” they chided.

I don’t think it was a bad purchase at all, because it wasn’t about the pencil. It was about mindset.

[Read more…]

Share Button

What’cha Want?

You know what is good for you.

  • Exercise more
  • Eat less
  • Read more
  • Watch less
  • Smell roses
  • Don’t stress

The disconnect comes when our behavior does not reflect our goals. As it happens, G.I. Joe had it right. Knowing really is half the battle.

This is the real source of discomfort, because it is so hard to run away from. Competing priorities seem to be informed by facts and reason, and in the end get trumped by baser desires. We’re stuck, rationalizing our failures. For some, it’s the little hobgoblin among the facets of our personality that really wanted that candy bar. For others, it’s the equally painful and soul-less realization that we are just a bag of protein-water, and a persistent imbalance of insulin triggered a primal craving.

knowing-is-half-the-battleMaddeningly enough, sometimes it is both, and we can’t resolve that either.

“The fundamental challenge in personal discipline it to align what you Want with what you Want to Want.” – Ike Pigott

So, in the end, you know what is good for you. Or, rather, if you know what is good for you, you’ll know what’s good for you. But that is no guarantee you’ll act on it.

Share Button

An Economic Conjecture

Here is a theory about our sluggish economic recovery:

The old time-frames for bust-to-boom are no longer operative templates.

Recessions used to take a long time to play out, because industries didn’t have the moment-to-moment vertical integration we see now in supply chains.

Inventories that sat idle were not only signs of wasted resources, they were also a buffer that slowed the signals of economic activity.

This is the first downturn of a hyper-connected market. We’re shedding jobs like we never have, because small-to-medium businesses now have access to the relevant data that informs layoffs faster. Those looking at the slope are seeing the same data as before, but compressed in time.

The recovery will not be quite as compressed, because there will be re-organization and slower buildup. Much like how gas prices rocket up, and float down.

The significance of this is that I wrote it nearly three years ago, on Cringely’s blog. Seems like ages ago. [Read more…]

Share Button