Human SpamOver the last few days, I’ve noticed a sudden increase in the amount of what I call “organic spam.” These are comments that are targeted to specific subjects that I write about, and obviously written by a human being who digested and comprehended the material on my site. It has none of the hallmarks of traditional auto-bot-spam, with the disjointed “Mad Libs” approach of dropping in keywords:

Hey. I was searching the internet for definitions ofChocolate Covered Cockroachesand I found your article. Funny stuff! I’ll be sure to come back often!

Fortunately, these nuisance comments and pingbacks tend to be easy to swat away. I use Akismet and Bad Behavior, and that’s been a great one-two punch. Until now.

One of my recent entries, Delegation, drew the following comment today from Chayah Masters:

Exactly what I tell my clients when they hire a part-time assistant from my company Gittel on the Go. It’s amazing how people want to be helped but have a difficult time letting go. I guess it is silent commentary on the state of our society. Work ethic is not what it used to be. That’s why my clients are overjoyed when they hire a “Gittel” from GittelontheGo.com. No micromanagement is needed and my clients are elated at the results they get merely from making a clear request.

That’s an 88-word response, to an entry that had 18 words. (Brevity is the soul of wit, after all.)

Not Just Blogs

I’ve seen this happening recently on a journalism forum I moderate. Human beings signing up for accounts, leaving one or two fairly innocuous comments, then pumping an obvious pitch to their website and service. In the case of the forum, we had to run them out of there, because they were directly competing with paid advertisers with their linking.

So — that lends us to the question, What is Spam anyway?

  • Unwanted advertising?
  • Gaming search engines for links?
  • Shameless self-promotion?

We all bring our own flavor to the definition. And I’m going to spend some time trying to draft a policy that more clearly enunciates what I consider “spam” to be.

Before the arrival of Akismet and the other tools, blog engines like Wordpress used to add a “nofollow” attribute to comment links. That way, even if a spammer got through, it wouldn’t get any link-credit from Google and Yahoo. However, this got in the way of legitimate links and promotion of a sense of community.

My Response

I had switched some code on Occam’s RazR to allow for the links to count, but that policy is changing. I’ve now gone to a system that will give my commenters credit for their links, but only once they’ve left three comments here. For those of you on Wordpress, the plugin is called Nofollow-Free. It allows you to configure the number of comments, and which sorts of links get the treatment.

I’m not the only one noticing this, by the way… Lee Lefever over at Common Craft has seen the same trend of human spam.

What’s your definition of spam, and how are you going to deal with this new twist?

[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, spam, blogging, communication[/tags]