communication. community. cognition.
Spam With a Human Touch
Over the last few days, I’ve noticed a sudden increase in the amount of what I call “organic spam.” These are comments that are targeted to specific subjects that I write about, and obviously written by a human being who digested and comprehended the material on my site. It has none of the hallmarks of traditional auto-bot-spam, with the disjointed “Mad Libs” approach of dropping in keywords:
Hey. I was searching the internet for definitions ofChocolate Covered Cockroachesand I found your article. Funny stuff! I’ll be sure to come back often!
Fortunately, these nuisance comments and pingbacks tend to be easy to swat away. I use Akismet and Bad Behavior, and that’s been a great one-two punch. Until now.
One of my recent entries, Delegation, drew the following comment today from Chayah Masters:
Exactly what I tell my clients when they hire a part-time assistant from my company Gittel on the Go. It’s amazing how people want to be helped but have a difficult time letting go. I guess it is silent commentary on the state of our society. Work ethic is not what it used to be. That’s why my clients are overjoyed when they hire a “Gittel” from GittelontheGo.com. No micromanagement is needed and my clients are elated at the results they get merely from making a clear request.
That’s an 88-word response, to an entry that had 18 words. (Brevity is the soul of wit, after all.)
Not Just Blogs
I’ve seen this happening recently on a journalism forum I moderate. Human beings signing up for accounts, leaving one or two fairly innocuous comments, then pumping an obvious pitch to their website and service. In the case of the forum, we had to run them out of there, because they were directly competing with paid advertisers with their linking.
So — that lends us to the question, What is Spam anyway?
- Unwanted advertising?
- Gaming search engines for links?
- Shameless self-promotion?
We all bring our own flavor to the definition. And I’m going to spend some time trying to draft a policy that more clearly enunciates what I consider “spam” to be.
Before the arrival of Akismet and the other tools, blog engines like WordPress used to add a “nofollow” attribute to comment links. That way, even if a spammer got through, it wouldn’t get any link-credit from Google and Yahoo. However, this got in the way of legitimate links and promotion of a sense of community.
My Response
I had switched some code on Occam’s RazR to allow for the links to count, but that policy is changing. I’ve now gone to a system that will give my commenters credit for their links, but only once they’ve left three comments here. For those of you on WordPress, the plugin is called Nofollow-Free. It allows you to configure the number of comments, and which sorts of links get the treatment.
I’m not the only one noticing this, by the way… Lee Lefever over at Common Craft has seen the same trend of human spam.
What’s your definition of spam, and how are you going to deal with this new twist?
[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, spam, blogging, communication[/tags]
| Print article | This entry was posted by Ike on March 6, 2008 at 10:50 am, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No trackbacks yet.
On Jobs
about 4 months ago - No comments
The following my piece from a larger compilation of thoughts by the authors at Social Media Explorer. The History of Steve Jobs will forever be clouded by the Mystery of Steve Jobs. He will go down as an irreplaceable force of creative vision, and years from now, people will still be wondering what would have
TV Catching Up to Me?
about 8 months ago - 2 comments
About a year and a half ago, I put forward the novel idea that cable and satellite providers needed to step up their offerings. Shows are increasingly becoming commodities, and there are other ways to access them, in whole or just the good parts. Now, it looks like DirecTV is taking that first step. A
Predictions About Predictions
about 1 year ago - 3 comments
Three-and-a-half years ago, I wrote a spoof about how analysis of mood and syntax on Twitter could be used to predict a woman’s likely moment of ovulation. A year-and-a-half ago, I wrote a piece about how Google was assembling a significant-enough chunk of content creation and distribution, it would have a prediction engine that could
Speed Saves
about 1 year ago - 17 comments
A gunman fired several rounds in a University of Texas library today. (I don’t think I have to recount the very sensitive issue with you… the rest of the media is sure to dredge up the story of the sniper in the tower.) The interesting piece for me today is how technology changed both the
Erasing the Objections
about 1 year ago - 20 comments
See if these points sound familiar: There’s nothing special about this technology, it’s just another way to communicate. It’s a technology that frees people to express themselves, storing their input sequentially. Innovators are jumping on a bandwagon, which will really be just a fad. There’s a limited base of research about its real effectiveness. Much
Fluid Platforms and Singing Whales
about 1 year ago - 4 comments
There will be a theme for the next week or so. Disruption and Adjustment. Before last week I had never heard of Ryu Murakami, but he’s at the center of an interesting case that may amplify the tremors of technology. From Robert McCrum in the Guardian: Earlier this month, in a manoeuvre I predict will
The Library in Your Friend List
about 1 year ago - 24 comments
I don’t like talking about current events much, because they have a tendency to soon be not-so-current. But one in particular may signal the tipping point of a trend that is of extreme relevance to the way you and I find useful information. The rumor is that Google is developing a true Facebook competitor called
Content Is King! Long Live the King!
about 2 years ago - 15 comments
Content is king. It started with a Tweet by Jeremy Meyers, that said the following: “Ironically, content about how “Content is King” is not an example of good content.” I responded with: “If Content were King, then Pink would have stayed dry.” I was referring, of course, to Pink’s performance at the Grammy Awards, where
Owning My Links
about 2 years ago - 12 comments
Part of the reason I started noodling with WordPress was the ability to “own” my own site. Not have it hosted elsewhere, not beholden to anyone else’s whims and limitations. I can do what I want with the template and the look and the feel and the content. I can even move the URL around,
about 3 years ago
Ike,
While Chayah’s comment does seem more spam than contributing to the post, it’s a good effort!
For the ones you and I Twittered about this week (Julie/Jen), I’m going to let them slide, unless they start to increase.
If the comment actually contributes to the discussion, I’ll give ‘em some link love. If it doesn’t in my humble judgement, it’s gone. It’s random and subjective, but that’s my policy.
Mike
about 3 years ago
This is a very timely post. I’ve been thinking to myself lately that I should at least leave a short comment after reading blog posts to let the writer know that I was here and interested in what they had to say.
Where I start having doubts is if that’s useful without having something to contribute to the topic.
I’m not looking to add spam to anyone’s site, just let them know that I appreciate their take. I hope that the difference can be seen in my sincerity vs. the examples Lee gave of commenters who, while positive, may not really have cared about the content.
about 3 years ago
I dunno. Maybe commenters who spam but leave somewhat thoughtful comments are really nice people — simply “with a job to do.”
-Mike, MikesPoints.com blog
about 3 years ago
John, you do raise an interesting issue. It’s not so much the quantum of value added, as the vector of the intent.
For instance, you tracked over here from Twitter. You already interact with me on a number of platforms and levels.
Dropping in to say “Thanks!” doesn’t trip any alarms for me, because you didn’t seek me out based on just that content.
In the example I give above, we’re talking about someone that most likely never would have come to Occam’s RazR until I used a keyword that fit their business profile. (A post that – including the title – only had 19 words.) That’s not natural traffic, and it’s most likely not someone who would hang around beyond leaving the egg to hatch.
about 3 years ago
Ike,
So, intent is more important than the outcome or result (forgetting about the link love/search engines results for the human spammers for a moment)?
– Mike
about 3 years ago
No, intent is not more important, but it does become a factor.
Had Chayah just made a comment about the importance of delegating work, or how underrated a skill it truly was, there wouldn’t be much of an issue. But looking at the comment, and the rather blatant use of the url, and the almost-but-not-quite ad copy inserted — it makes you wonder.
Big yeah for transparency. But it’s clear she was seeking more value from me than she was giving to the rest of you.
about 3 years ago
I freely and happily kill any comment that looks like spam… but I send a note to the commenter: “I appreciate your comment. Unfortunately, the link you gave seems to be a spam/scraper/whatever site (I fill in the blank). If I am wrong, just respost the comment with a link to your own site (or no link at all, if you don’t have one).
I’ve done that about 50 times in the last couple of months and have NEVER had anyone follow up.
Allan
about 3 years ago
Thanks for posting about this issue. It’s been on my mind, and I haven’t known how to deal with it. I’m heading over to the WordPress site to get the plugin and to learn a little more about spam control for my blog.