communication. community. cognition.
The All-tax
(Another Modest Proposal for your consideration)
Tax cut. Tax hike. Tax break. Tax loophole.
The sad piece of it is that those of us who do pay income taxes have become numb to the baseline. The money is ours to begin with, and then the government confiscates it (under threat of imprisonment) for some nobler public purpose. Some might have you think it’s the other way around.
Which brings us to the people for which there is no income tax. There are two types: those that earn on capital gains (and are taxed appropriately), and those who don’t earn enough income.
The first we won’t really bother with at the moment. They’re not listening anyway, as they are trying to lock up their assets or move them overseas as we speak.
The second group – those with low incomes – have through no fault of their own become divorced from the real relationship they ought to enjoy with their proceeds and their government. When Uncle Sam only gives you things and never asks for anything in return, then you tend to see him as Santa Claus. (Both wear ridiculous suits, and enough trips to the pork-barrel will equip Sam with the requisite figure for Nick.)
My plan is to reconcile the poor with their patriotic duty to pay taxes.
I’m an Ogre.
Here’s how the All-tax works. Every household making less than $45,000 in a year will receive a $5,000 check from the Federal Government. However, by accepting the check they immediately enter into a minimum 10% tax bracket.
Yep. Ten percent. And the check from the government is taxable.
If you make $45,000 your five-grand All-tax bonus would take you up to $50,000 – and the 10% tax sets you right back where you were. If you make less than $45,000 you end up to the good, and of course those making more than $45,000 are unaffected. This has the net effect of making every American household a tax-paying household without increasing the burden on anyone.
When everyone has the same conscious recognition of the role they play in supporting the government, it changes perspectives quickly.
Your thoughts? What am I missing? Am I evil?
| Print article | This entry was posted by Ike on November 21, 2008 at 2:55 am, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
No trackbacks yet.
Political Vegetable
about 1 month ago - 1 comment
“Modern politics is an endless onion. You can peel back layers as long as you want, and everything you find smells bad and makes you cry.”
Tastes Great, Less Filling
about 1 month ago - 1 comment
“Socialism is easy to like on full stomachs, but isn’t so good at filling them.”
Kill Art and Craft, and you Might Share The Coffin
about 2 months ago - 13 comments
One of the finest compliments I ever received was from Dan Cates, who was then my assistant news director at the ABC affiliate in Birmingham. “I wish I had a whole newsroom full of Ike Pigotts.” It was weeks before I could walk through a doorway without my big head getting in the way. I
A Poverty of Realism
about 4 months ago - 3 comments
“No matter how badly you wish it so, pure intentions and a bottomless checkbook are not an automatic solution for anything.”
The Future of Political Journalism?
about 4 months ago - 7 comments
Traditional Journalism is in for several more tremors before the implosion is finished. I’ve mentioned several of the trends that are accelerating the shift toward a concept I call the Embedded Journalist, but don’t expect that transition to be smooth. In California, for example, a political campaign high on finance and low on interest is
Imported Turf
about 4 months ago - 23 comments
While traditional media outlets claim to “embrace the conversation,” are they still holding it at arm’s length? Is it enough to host comments and invite input online, without the due diligence to see if others are manipulating the agenda? A few days ago, I wrote about what appeared to be a fairly obvious case of
Political Geometry
about 5 months ago - 1 comment
“Modern politics has become an exercise in bending over backwards to bend your opponent forwards.”
A Lesson on Worth
about 5 months ago - 19 comments
I recently ran across one of those messages about how our nation needs to get its priorities in order, because we pay professional athletes so much more than we do teachers. On the surface, it seems a difficult point to argue, because obviously teaching is important. This is where an understanding of marginal utility comes
Color Me Invisible
about 5 months ago - 10 comments
In many issues of communication, color does matter. Some colors evoke strength, some safety, some progress, and some security. Some project cowardice, and others royalty. The mistake is in assuming too much – that a spectrum of colors will cover every flavor of difference and distinction. American politics has divided down Red and Blue lines,
Who Needs Avatar? We Already Live In Parallel Universes
about 7 months ago - 11 comments
Sarah Palin is joining Fox News. Cue the cheers from her fans and loyalists who will get her fresh and mavericky take on world events and politics. Cue the jeers from her detractors, who are already writing punchlines that reinforce their existing opinions. The fact is we now live in a strange age, one where
about 1 year ago
This type of approach is the only way to approach fairness, and to get all citizens invested in the country’s fiscal direction. Creating a permanent and growing class of non-taxpayers instantiates class envy and political pandering. Very dangerous.
about 1 year ago
It would be a lot more paperwork, and would probably result in a lot of under-the-counter stuff.
Things like this make me favor the nation-wide sales tax option– not because I think it’s a good thing, but because the 50% of folks who currently pay net zero taxes are never going to accept a tax raise on them, as a group.
about 1 year ago
Two questions:
1. Where does the $5K that goes to all these families come from?
2. Ditto Foxfier (kind of) – how do you get this group that has never paid taxes to not riot?
I think it’s a good idea. No, you’re not evil. If my grad school stipend gets taxes taken out (and it does), then I can’t understand how other people can get away with not paying.
about 1 year ago
In the grand scheme of things, that $5K per low-income family is a bargain-basement price to pay for the sense of ownership those voters will develop.
How do you get them not to riot? Easy. They are paying taxes out of a larger sum of money they never would have seen anyway. In every single case, the math works out to their net benefit. What’s to complain? A little bit of hassle? Having to actually calculate and file?
Maybe this is an impetus for simplifying the code anyway…
about 1 year ago
I think God’s way is fair — in the Bible He requires a 10% tithe from all people. It’s equal, it’s fair. If you make $50,000/year, you pay 10% of that. And if you make $1 million, you pay 10% of that. Seems to me like if you’re going to have an income tax, this is fair. Of course, I still agree with Ron Paul, that it’s our money to begin with, & since we pay property taxes, sales tax, gas tax, etc., then income tax should be abolished.
about 1 year ago
I like your idea. I’ve seen studies or commentary over the last few years—probably in the Wall Street Journal, maybe elsewhere—that lament this, offer similar ideas. The question is, how do we move this from Quixotic quest to something people take seriously? Especially in this environment? I have no idea! I see inflation in the future, as the gov’t prints money as the only possible way out. For a short while.
Ideas?
There’s a review out there of William Greider’s book on David Stockman (the Reagan apostate) that begins with these two quotes that I still like to pull out from time to time:
The most important function of the federal government is mailing checks to citizens–Social Security checks to the elderly, pension checks to retired soldiers and civil servants, reimbursement checks for hospitals and doctors who provide medical care for the aged and the poor, welfare checks for the dependent, veterans checks to pensioners.
-William Greider, The Education of David Stockman
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
-Sir Alex Fraser Tytler (1742-1813)
about 1 year ago
Maybe I’m missing something, but how does it give them a sense of ownership if they receive a check that pays all the taxes they’d owe and leaves them with a bit left over? Seems like that would *increase* their sense of entitlement, because instead of not owing tax in the first place, now they receive a bill and actively see someone else pay it each and every time. Then they’ll want their electric bill paid, too.
about 1 year ago
I like the idea (a lot), but Marina’s question is key: How does this give them a sense of ownership if it’s a “break-even at worst” scenario?
about 1 year ago
@marina and @mike – great question.
This isn’t a matter of raising revenues. It’s a matter of re-establishing a mindset.
Just knowing that you are now in a tax bracket is a reminder that it’s YOUR money to begin with, money the government subsequently takes away.
It would be easier to compute the net effect of the exchange in advance and apply that. Instead, the money is given to the individual, thereby assuring that everyone is in a 10% tax bracket.
The premise is that with more people feeling like they are paying a tax (which they are), you’d have a little more scrutiny on the spending side, and less groundswell to “soak” taxpayers.
If everyone pays taxes, then everyone “owns” Leviathan instead of being “owned” by it.
about 1 year ago
That makes sense — that it’s more a matter of communicating (reminding of) the appropriate mindset. But if the point is to give people a sense of ownership and responsibility, rather than entitlement, isn’t this more like lying to them than it is shaping their perception?
After all, this only creates the illusion of “skin in the game.” They’re given money — other people’s money — and agree to give most or all of it back. That’s not ownership. That’s a game.
Receiving and then simply handing back someone else’s money is not “paying taxes,” nor do I belive it would create that sense of ownership. What would? Perhaps coupling this All Tax idea with some potential consequences or rewards, some “threat” of expense. I’m not sure exactly how that would work out, but that makes it a lot more than a game.
about 1 year ago
I’ve been thinking about this post a lot. What if we stopped all government withholding and everyone to had to responsibly set aside the correct amount and send a check in on April 15th? (Even the poorest people have 7.5% Social Security/Medicaid paid by their employer that they likely never consider.)
I bet a ton of people would find themselves at risk of bouncing a check to the IRS, and maybe that would stir up some animosity. (Although, I can totally see some people arguing that it’s not fair the government left it up to them to save money.)
about 1 year ago
This post has been keeping me up at night. (Well, since I’m up all night anyway, maybe I should say it’s been keeping me up during the day!)
I hear so many people talk *excitedly* about getting tax refunds. They look FORWARD to tax day, because their perception is they GET money — somehow totally missing that it’s their money that they loaned to the government at 0% interest.
If we stop withholding, then everyone would have to pay, and no one would get a refund, so no one would be so damn happy about April 15th.