Archives for July 2008

The Accidental Murrow

My friend Ron won a Murrow Award last month. For those of you who don’t know about such things, the Edward R. Murrow Award is one of the most prestigious honors one can earn. It’s up there with a Peabody, and above an Emmy. What’s unusual about his achievement is that he didn’t win the one he thought he should.

Ron has been kicked around some in the last couple of years. He’s an old-school journalist in an era where those values are no longer just a luxury – at times they get in the way of “progress.” He took a stand on an issue of newsroom ethics and was promptly jettisoned. How dare he put sound principles over a financial arrangement!

Ron landed another television news job, and had it just long enough to relocate the family to Mississippi but not long enough to properly ascertain the incoming office politics that made him expendable. Fortunately, with all the packing and unpacking, Ron never lost either of his two greatest assets: his ability to write and tell engaging stories, and his brutal self-honesty. He needed both to win his Murrow.

Ghosts of Mississippi

Ron grew up in a time when the South was still reeling from the memories of Bull Connor and the civil rights struggle. He grew up in a place that taught the notions that merely living in the South inferred an inferiority of class, education, and morality. In the years I got to know him through countless email exchanges, phone calls, and tape swaps, Ron never let my zip code get in the way of our friendship… but then again, I was an atypical Southerner, a transplant.

The Mississippi Ron discovered was very different than the Mississippi he imagined. “Immersion therapy” has done wonders. However, this story isn’t about regional biases and how to overcome them — it’s about how Ron grew and looked past himself to earn his highest praise, and how he got it accidentally.

Going to Jackson

With the second job upheaval, Ron’s wife Karen picked up the slack. An old-school radio reporter in her own right, she landed with Mississippi Public Broadcasting, and fate eventually brought Ron onto the staff. His future winning entry was the sixth assignment he did, without yet having a full-time position. It was a story about children entering a contest, writing blues songs.

It’s a fantastic piece, and Ron wanted to enter it for Small Market Best Feature. His boss didn’t have much experience with the Murrow process, and entered all of the station’s entries in the Network level. Since Mississippi Public Broadcasting has five stations, they are a network, right? So instead of competing against the Tupelos, the Cupertinos, and the El Pasos – Ron’s little entry from the Delta was in with ABC, NBC, and NPR. And won.  Two national Murrows, kicking with the big boys.

Selling Short

I joked with Ron that his award is the Accidental Murrow.  His piece would have been a lock to win a regional award, and most likely would have won in the small-market radio category.  He never wanted to run with the big dogs, but turned loose on their track he beat them all.  He deserves it, because he’s that talented, that determined, that dedicated to the craft – and was open to change.  Yet the only thing that stood between Ron and the validation of his excellence was himself.

Too often we stand in our own way, settling for less, settling for the sure.  We sell ourselves short.  Ron, thanks for reminding me to go long now and then.  You can listen to his award-winning piece below, and by all means, share your tale of selling short in the comments.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, Murrow, broadcasting, journalism[/tags]

Share Button
Play

News Bits

{{myquote|Modern news is made more like sausage, but is less humane to the main course.}}

Share Button

Too Simple

If there is a unifying there here, it’s in explaining the seemingly complex in the most simple way possible.  Occam’s Razor is a means of comparing multiple explanations or theories, with the notion that the simplest is likely the truth.  However, many people are guiding themselves by the fallacy that the simplest explanation is the truth.

The factor that’s missed is the first part of Occam’s Razor, that the theories to be compared are equally sound.  Theories are tested by evidence and experiment, and by their ability to predict the future.  The theory that Atlas is holding up the Earth on his shoulders and standing on the back of a giant tortise is certainly easier to envision than warping of space/time and explaining the math of gravity — but it’s not going to help you calculate orbits.

These thoughts come to mind as I revisit yesterday’s item about Starbucks and the economy.  Many people want to believe the world is a simple place.  If Starbucks is losing jobs, then there are fewer jobs in the retail coffee industry.  If someone is getting rich, then others must be getting poor.  If prices are going up, then someone is being unfair.

Deep down, we all crave simplicity.  The less we have to think, the more we can create and imagine and think about the things we want to.  The danger comes when we paint too simple a picture for ourselves, and end up with a working model of our universe that is flawed.  If someone believes that the rich get richer only by making poor people poorer, and that the only way to get wealth is to inherit it, then that individual will be less likely to engage in the behaviors that would lead to wealth accumulation.  A simple worldview can cloud reality — and in this instance becomes a dangerous self-fulfilling prophecy.

Sometimes it’s okay to shave some edges off the models we use because we don’t need the level of detail the extra work would require.  When the additional complexity isn’t worth the potential reward, then by all means ditch it.  Just be careful about applying your template to other people, as they may have a need for a greater or lesser degree of detail in their results and their reality.

What are some of your pet-peeve oversimplifications?

[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, Occam’s Razor, philosophy, science, theory, economics[/tags]

Share Button

The Java Economy

“Imitation is the sincerest form of television” – Fred Allen

Apparently, the producers at Good Morning America have taken a page from The Daily Show. Last night, Comedy Central re-aired the show with Larry Wilmore’s insightful and informed piece about how a down economy is destroying Beverly Hills; people are only buying new Bentleys every other year, instead of annually, and plastic surgeons are being forced to do actual reconstructive work!

On Wednesday’s GMA, the producers sent Bianna Golodryga (whose name has appeared here often enough that I don’t have to Google for spelling anymore) to intro a piece about the economy in front of a Starbucks. Paraphrased, it’s getting so bad that people aren’t buying coffee, and Starbucks is closing stores!

Let me understand… people are no longer choosing to spend $4 for a cup of coffee? This is proof of a recession? Yes, Starbucks is closing 600 stores, which is 8-percent of the total nationwide. But let me ask a couple of common-sense questions:

  1. Didn’t we hear about all of those poor mom-n-pop java joints that were suffering because the evil behemoth from the great Northwest was invading?
    Actually, economic studies proved that independent coffeehouses did better when a Starbucks came into the neighborhood. It drove up the overall market for premium coffee consumption, and everyone won. So is this Starbucks retreat a sign that people aren’t buying coffee anymore? Or that they’re buying it from somewhere other than a Starbucks?
  2. How much of the Starbucks retreat is really about growing too fast? How many of the 600 stores were within a half-mile of another location? A quarter-mile? Across the street?
    We’ll never know. Starbucks is very good at generating attention for itself. It is an iconic market leader, but too many people will walk away from this GMA story confusing the market-leader with the overall market. Much in the same way that US “domestic auto production” is still calculated as though Nissan, Toyota, Mercedes, Hyundai, and Honda don’t have manufacturing facilities in the United States.

I’m not digging on GMA, I just happen to to watch. But it’s clear that the standards that once reigned over network news continue to drop. Truth is a function of both fact and context – and modern television journalism provides too much of the former without the latter.

Update: the analysts apparently agree with me:

Starbucks said the 600 stores are either unprofitable now or are not expected to meet future return thresholds. All of the targeted units are close to another company-operated store, [Chief Executive Peter] Bocian said.

“This is validating some of the critics who said they were opening stores too close to one another,” said James Walsh, an analyst at Starbucks investor Coldstream Capital Management.

Those critics complained that the company had overbuilt in the United States — particularly in major urban areas like Manhattan, where it is not unusual to see several Starbucks in a single city block.

[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, ABC, GMA, Good Morning America, Bianna Golodryga, Starbucks, journalism, economy, The Daily Show, Larry Wilmore[/tags]

Share Button

Charity

{{myquote|There is absolutely nothing spiritual nor moral about using the power of the state to take others’ property as a means to fuel your own philanthropic and charitable desires.}}
[tags]Ike Pigott, Occam’s RazR, Economics, Liberty, Philanthropy, Government[/tags]

Share Button